Ithaca Public Relations   159 Snyder Hill Road   Ithaca, NY 14850   607-280-3840   info@ithacapr.com
P.R. MYTHS
Smashing myths / Many public relations people are headed in the wrong
direction

By Marc Jampole

Every profession has its myths that are eradicated through time and advances
in knowledge. In the 17th century, physicians thought they could break fevers
by opening a vein and letting the patient's blood flow out. And in the 1920s,
some prominent physicians prescribed deadly radiation treatments to
promote longevity. In the medical profession, these and many other myths
have long ago given ground to rational, scientific analysis.

Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for public relations. To an alarming
degree, public relations practitioners, especially at agencies, continue to
make important strategic decisions based on myths developed in long-dead
eras.

Here are three of the myths we run into most often:

Myth 1: Always release bad news and never release good news on Friday
afternoon. This myth is based on a superficial analysis of old surveys of
newspaper readership that suggests that fewer people use the news media
on Saturday.

But what if the target audience is educated, operates a business or has a high
income or net worth? All of these audiences use the news media at least as
extensively on Saturday as they do on other days. If these audiences are
important to an organization, as they might be to companies selling to other
companies, companies selling luxury goods or nonprofits in the middle of
capital campaigns, then releasing good news on Friday may be a good thing
and releasing bad news on Friday may not achieve the goal of reducing
widespread dissemination of the negative facts.

Consideration of a very important audience, employees, usually argues
against a Friday release of bad news. When an organization releases bad
news on Friday, your employees have the entire weekend to stew about it at
home without the guidance of management. If maintaining the commitment of
employees or persuading employees to take certain actions is important to an
organization, as it so often the case in merger battles, bankruptcies,
downsizing programs and other "bad" situations, then a Friday release may
hurt the organization. Even if the organization holds meetings with employees
to let them know the bad news before the announcement, it is still sending
them home to two days of negative news coverage and rumors, instead of
reinforcing to them its messages about the bad news the very next day.

Myth 2: You have to write long case histories to attract feature coverage of
how your organization helped a client or customer. We run into this myth
virtually every time my public relations agency begins working for a
technology client. In all cases, the company is deep into completing a six- or
seven-page case history that tries to demonstrate how the customer solved a
problem by using the client's product or service.

To prove that this is another public relations myth, merely peruse some of the
thousands of pages of case histories that appear in print and Internet news
media every month -- virtually all of the case histories are written by reporters.
In most cases, the reporters like to do their own research, although they are
appreciative of the information and contacts that an agency or company can
provide.

What persuades a reporter to do a case history is not a lengthy narrative, but
the hook -- the angle of the story that makes it interesting, unique or trendy.
Telling the reporter what's newsworthy shouldn't take more than a few
paragraphs. If the hook isn't in the headline or first paragraph, it's likely
reporters will never understand why the story is important, because they don't
have the time to read deep enough into the story to find it. Reporters are
busy, and they're inundated with mediocre story ideas; so an organization
must tell them right away why the case history is important. Once that task is
accomplished, there's no need to tell them anything else until they ask for
additional information.

A company will attract far more positive news coverage if it develops six
intriguing, newsworthy case histories of one-page each, then identifies the
reporters with the optimal interest in each, than if it writes one six-page case
history.

Myth 3: I have friends in the news media who will cover the story. The
underlying assumption behind this myth is not only fallacious, but also
suggests that reporters are driven more by friendship than by their analysis of
what is newsworthy. Yet, more than half of our clients tell us that most
agencies have promoted "friends in the news media" as a major reason to
engage them as public relations consultants.

What that statement says about journalists is that they are unprofessional and
do not pursue excellence. What does it do to a sports team on any level
when coaches play favorites instead of putting the best players on the field or
floor? Typically, it tears the team apart, the team loses and, depending on the
level of play, either the coach is fired or ends up surrounded by a lot of angry
parents. A reporter playing favorites is just as doomed to failure, and that's
why the overwhelming majority of reporters do not do it.

Every journalist has a constantly evolving set of screens by which she or he
judges if a story is worth covering, including: the media outlet's definition of
what is newsworthy; the editorial scope of the media outlet; the outlet's
regularly scheduled formatted stories, such as profiles, lists, case histories or
news round-ups; the specialization of the reporter; and the current trends in
the reporter's coverage area.

With that fairly long list, friendship is never really an issue.

These are examples of many myths perpetrated by many PR professionals
that reduce the effectiveness of PR campaigns. At the heart of all these myths
is a failure to analyze the current needs of the target audiences. These target
audiences may include the public; but for many organizations, important
audiences are just as likely to include an industry, investors or large donors, a
job title at targeted businesses, employees or other groups with special
viewing, surfing and reading habits.

And in every case, the news media itself must be considered one of the most
important of all target audiences, since the story will not appear if the
organization fails to persuade reporters to cover it. An analysis of the needs
of this very important target market before beginning any public relations
campaign will yield better results than reliance on old myths.



(Marc Jampole, of Squirrel Hill, is principal of Jampole Communications Inc., a
Pittsburgh-based public relations and advertising agency. Reach him at
412-471-2463,
www.jampole.com,  or mjampole@jampole.com.)

Originally published in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Tuesday, November 23,
2004
The key to getting press coverage...
It's not what you think...









Return to
The Insider









I.P.R. offers media relations
seminars and workshops. Visit our
Services page to learn more.









Return to
The Insider









Find out more about the I.P.R.
Proactive Approach to media
relations. Visit our
About Us page.









Return to
The Insider









Thought Leadership shapes the
conversation and frames the
debate in a
Crisis Control situation.









Return to
The Insider









Less is more in a news interview.
Contact Us for a consultation if you
have an important one coming up.









Return to
The Insider
Copyright 2005 - 2013  Ithaca Public Relations  All Rights Reserved
Straight up, no-nonsense marketing and PR advice from The Insider, the flagship e-advice column from Ithaca Public Relations. Subscribe today!
Ithaca, NY   607-280-3840   info@ithacapr.com
P.R. Myths Exposed